<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Poliblog Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Recreating British Politics from the Bottom</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Test Your Site in 80 Different Web Browsers: browsershots.org</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/test-your-site-in-80-different-web-browsers-browsershotsorg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/test-your-site-in-80-different-web-browsers-browsershotsorg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/test-your-site-in-80-different-web-browsers-browsershotsorg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Browsershots" href="http://www.browsershots.org/" target="_blank">Browsershots.org</a> offers a service which will display screenshots of how your website will appear in a wide range of different web browsers:</p>
<p>The service displays thumbnails of your website after you enter the web address into q a queue and return to the site a few minutes later.</p>
<p>There are options to check the appearance with different screen sizes and colour depths, and with Javascript,  Flash and Java turned on or off.</p>
<div class="taglist">As a service it won't verify everything about your site, but it is a good quick check. There is also a paid version of the service.</div>
<p align="center"><img height="234" alt="q-screenshot-browsershots" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/q-screenshot-browsershotsorg-1.jpg" width="290" vspace="5" /></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Browsershots" href="http://www.browsershots.org/" target="_blank">Browsershots.org</a> offers a service which will display screenshots of how your website will appear in a wide range of different web browsers:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>What is Browsershots?</p>
<p>Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers. It is a free open-source online service created by Johann C. Rocholl. When you submit your web address, it will be added to the job queue. A number of distributed computers will open your website in their browser. Then they will make screenshots and upload them to the central server here.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The service displays thumbnails of your website after you enter the web address into  a queue and return to the site a few minutes later.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><img height="321" alt="q-screenshot-browsershots" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/q-screenshot-browsershotsorg.jpg" width="400" vspace="5" /></p>
</blockquote>
<p>There are options to check the appearance with different screen sizes and colour depths, and with Javascript,  Flash and Java turned on or off.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="taglist">As a service it won&#8217;t verify everything about your site, but it is a good quick check. There is also a paid version of the service.</div>
<div class="taglist"> </div>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/broswershots.org" rel="tag">broswershots.org</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+testing" rel="tag">web testing</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/servies" rel="tag">servies</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reviews" rel="tag">reviews</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/broswershots.org" rel="tag">broswershots.org</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+testing" rel="tag">web testing</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/servies" rel="tag">servies</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reviews" rel="tag">reviews</a>[/tags]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/test-your-site-in-80-different-web-browsers-browsershotsorg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing a New Search Facility: Comments Welcome</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/testing-a-new-search-facility-comments-welcome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/testing-a-new-search-facility-comments-welcome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lijit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lijit widget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/testing-a-new-search-facility-comments-welcome/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img height="109" alt="q-screendump-lidget-search" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/q-screendump-lidget-search.jpg" width="197" align="right" vspace="5" />I'm trying out a new search facility on the Wardman Wire from a company called <a title="Lijit" href="http://www.lijit.com/" target="_blank">Lijit</a>.</p>
<p>The search facility uses the Google search results, but allows me to nominate a network of websites from which an alternative set of search results are selected - so the service incorporates features of social networking websites into the site-search.</p>
<p>I have set up some of the other contributors to the Wardman Wire as my "network", and I'd be interested to hear what you think.</p>
<p>You can find the search box at the bottom of the sidebar on the <a title="Wardman Wire Blog Version" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/" target="_blank">blog version of the site</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img height="109" alt="q-screendump-lidget-search" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/q-screendump-lidget-search.jpg" width="197" align="right" vspace="5" />I&#8217;m trying out a new search facility on the Wardman Wire from a company called <a title="Lijit" href="http://www.lijit.com/" target="_blank">Lijit</a>.</p>
<p>The search facility uses the Google search results, but allows me to nominate a network of websites from which an alternative set of search results are selected - so the service incorporates features of social networking websites into the site-search.</p>
<p>I have set up some of the other contributors to the Wardman Wire as my &#8220;network&#8221;, and I&#8217;d be interested to hear what you think.</p>
<p>You can find the search box at the bottom of the sidebar on the <a title="Wardman Wire Blog Version" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/" target="_blank">blog version of the site</a>.</p>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/lijit" rel="tag">lijit</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/lijit+widget" rel="tag">lijit widget</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/social+search" rel="tag">social search</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/lijit" rel="tag">lijit</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/lijit+widget" rel="tag">lijit widget</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/social+search" rel="tag">social search</a>[/tags]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/testing-a-new-search-facility-comments-welcome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guardian Publishes Web Traffic Breakdown by Section</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/guardian-publishes-web-traffic-breakdown-by-section/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/guardian-publishes-web-traffic-breakdown-by-section/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Number Crunching]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comment is free traffic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[guardian politics traffic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[guardian unlimited]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/guardian-publishes-web-traffic-breakdown-by-section/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm ready to be hoist by my own petard on this one, as it is an old story - but I haven't seen it reported anywhere: the Guardian has started publishing a sectional breakdown of its traffic figures.</p>
<p>The Guardian has started breaking its web traffic figures down by the various sections of its website: News, Arts, Blogs, Books, Business, Comment is Free, Education, Environment, Film, Football, Life and Style, Media, Money, Music, Observer, Politics, Science, Society, Sport, Technology, Travel.</p>
<p>So now blogs in each of these niches can start to make some interesting comparisons.</p>
<p>The numbers have been <a title="Guardian Unlimited Traffic" href="http://www.adinfo-guardian.co.uk/guardian-unlimited/traffic-users.shtml" target="_blank">published as part of the advertising offer for the Guardian</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ready to be hoist by my own petard on this one, as it is an old story - but I haven&#8217;t seen it reported anywhere: the Guardian has started publishing a sectional breakdown of its traffic figures.</p>
<p>The Guardian has started breaking its web traffic figures down by the various sections of its website: News, Arts, Blogs, Books, Business, Comment is Free, Education, Environment, Film, Football, Life and Style, Media, Money, Music, Observer, Politics, Science, Society, Sport, Technology, Travel.</p>
<p>So now blogs in each of these niches can start to make some interesting comparisons.</p>
<p>The numbers have been <a title="Guardian Unlimited Traffic" href="http://www.adinfo-guardian.co.uk/guardian-unlimited/traffic-users.shtml" target="_blank">published as part of the advertising offer for the Guardian</a>.</p>
<h2>Overall Guardian September Figures</h2>
<h3>Worldwide Totals</h3>
<p>Worldwide Page Impressions: 208,701,946<br />
Worldwide Monthly unique users: 24,186,422</p>
<p>UK Page Impressions: 93,244,526<br />
Worldwide Monthly unique users: 8,972,467</p>
<p>These Worldwide figures are generated from the <a title="Guardian September 2008 Traffic Audit" href="http://www.abce.co.uk/ABCE_PDFS/15576682.pdf" target="_blank">monthly audit of Guardian logfiles</a> by the <a title="ABCe" href="http://www.abce.co.uk/" target="_blank">Audit Bureau of Circulations (Electronic)</a> .</p>
<h3>Detailed Section Totals</h3>
<p>Here are the detailed numbers for <a title="Guardian August Traffic" href="http://www.adinfo-guardian.co.uk/guardian-unlimited/images/tables/sept-08-users-table.gif" target="_blank">August</a> and <a title="Guardian September Traffic" href="http://www.adinfo-guardian.co.uk/guardian-unlimited/images/tables/sept-08-users-table.gif" target="_blank">September</a>.</p>
<p><strong>August Detailed Figures.</strong></p>
<p align="center"><img height="413" alt="20081103-guardian-aug-08-users-table" hspace="5" src="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/20081103-guardian-aug-08-users-table.gif" width="400" vspace="5" /></p>
<p><strong>September Detailed Figures.</strong></p>
<p align="center"><img height="411" alt="20081103-guardian-sept-08-users-table" hspace="5" src="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/20081103-guardian-sept-08-users-table-1.gif" width="399" vspace="5" /></p>
<p>This detailed data is generated by Generated by <a title="Omniture" href="http://www.omniture.com/" target="_blank">Omniture</a>, who are totally reputable. The data is generated from a Javascript snippet in each page, which means that the figures are (very roughly - my guess would be to allow a tolerance of perhaps +/- 20%) comparable with Google Analytics figures. My detailed comments are below the fold.</p>
<p><span id="more-246"></span><br />
<h2>Comment</h2>
<p>The most interesting comparison with Independent Political Blogs are probably the <strong>UK</strong> figures for the <strong>Comment is Free</strong> and the <strong>Politics Sections</strong> of the Guardian Website, since most UK political blogs have their traffic massively dominated by UK visitors (to the degree is &gt;80-90% or more - there are very few with significant US traffic).</p>
<p>The traffic profile for these Guardian Sections is broader and shallower than most political blogs. That has implications for potential advertisers, which I will cover in a further article.</p>
<p>What I will add now is that careful correlation of this data with the Guardian Rate Card and Financial Reports would facilitate some quite revealing analysis, for example to compare the <strong>potential</strong> advertising income of the site with the <strong>estimated</strong> income.</p>
<p>There are also massive variations between August and September. That is partly due to the Olympics, partly to the summer holidays and Party Conference season, and possibly also due to the new reports bedding in at the Guardian.</p>
<p>This is the current ratecard, which is marked as &#8220;Effective from September 2005&#8243;. That statement tells its own story of over-optimistic pricing.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="/blog/wp-content/uploads/20081004-guardian-unlimited-ratecard.jpg"><img height="277" alt="20081004-guardian-unlimited-ratecard" hspace="5" src="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/20081004-guardian-unlimited-ratecard-small.jpg" width="400" vspace="5" /></a></p>
<h2>Wrapping Up</h2>
<p>Next time I&#8217;ll make some comparisons using these figures between Guardian advertising and advertising on blogs.</p>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/comment+is+free+traffic" rel="tag">comment is free traffic</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/guardian+politics+traffic" rel="tag">guardian politics traffic</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/guardian+unlimited" rel="tag">guardian unlimited</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+statistics" rel="tag">web statistics</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+traffic" rel="tag">web traffic</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/comment+is+free+traffic" rel="tag">comment is free traffic</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/guardian+politics+traffic" rel="tag">guardian politics traffic</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/guardian+unlimited" rel="tag">guardian unlimited</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+statistics" rel="tag">web statistics</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+traffic" rel="tag">web traffic</a>[/tags]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/11/guardian-publishes-web-traffic-breakdown-by-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I use an offline Blog Editor: 20 Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/why-i-use-an-offline-blog-editor-20-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/why-i-use-an-offline-blog-editor-20-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bleezer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BlogDesk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogdesk review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BlogJet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ecto]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Flock]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[johannes oppermann]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MarsEdit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[offline blog editor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Post2Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Qumana]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Scribefire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Thingamablog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[w.bloggar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Live Writer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Zoundry Raven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/why-i-use-an-offline-blog-editor-20-benefits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img height="330" alt="20071015-blogdesk-screendump" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20071015-blogdesk-screendump-3.gif" width="279" vspace="5" /></p>
<p>Offline blog editors are PC-based editors that allow blog posts to be written on a local PC and then uploaded as a separate operation. In conversation last night I was asked about the benefits. I put a list together, and I thought I would post it today. </p>
<p>I've now done something like 2000 blog posts using an offline Blog Editor called <a title="Blogdesk" href="http://www.blogdesk.org/">Blogdesk</a> by Johannes Oppermann. I am very pleased with the software.</p>
<p>This article explains the benefits and why I think that offline editors are a GOOD THING.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offline blog editors are PC-based editors that allow blog posts to be written on a local PC and then uploaded as a separate operation. In conversation last night I was asked about the benefits. I put a list together, and I thought I would post it today. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve now done something like 2000 blog posts using an offline Blog Editor called <a title="Blogdesk" href="http://www.blogdesk.org/">Blogdesk</a> by Johannes Oppermann. I am very pleased with the software. This is only suitable for a PC, but there are other editors available, and I have a list at the bottom of the article. Here is what Blogdesk looks like: Click on the image for a full screenshot.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/20071015-blogdesk-screendump.gif"></a></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20071015-blogdesk-screendump-1.gif"><img height="314" alt="20071015-blogdesk-screendump" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20071015-blogdesk-screendump-2.gif" width="358" vspace="5" /></a></p>
<h2>Offline Editor Benefits</h2>
<p>These are the benefits of Blogdesk which I came up with. This is not exhaustive.</p>
<ol>
<li>I do maybe 95% of my editing offline, and can then &#8220;squirt&#8221; a post in maybe 10 seconds, rather than having to pfaff with online delays (and I am on a relatively slow - 512kbps - link), and I get a good editor and decent image crop / resize / borders / align utility that is v. quick.</li>
<li>Responsiveness is massively better than any online editor.</li>
<li>The is no need to login to WordPress every time I do something.</li>
<li>I have maybe 25 different post templates some with WP Options and<br />
Custom fields set up as required etc, e.g., with all the different<br />
attribution links in for the different cartoonists each morning.</li>
<li>In my setup I run with 2 copies of WP (the &#8220;<a title="Wardman Wire Magazine" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/" target="_blank">Magazine</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a title="Wardman Wire Blog" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/" target="_blank">Blog</a>&#8221; views) - and things like videos have to be posted to each separately easily.</li>
<li>I have boilerplate phrases and paragraphs to hand.</li>
<li>There is no need to upload pictures and photos through the Wordpress online image library feature, which is slow.</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t have problems with my connection going down or website response times<br />
while editing.</li>
<li>I also cross-post quite regularly - I can cross-post just by ticking off boxes next to each one.</li>
<li>I can get straight at the last 99 posts without needing to troll through the Wordpress Backoffice.</li>
<li>I can automatically upload sound files. I only use this feature for small files since I have a tight limit set on my server for &#8220;upload&#8221; size. I usually use ftp for media files.</li>
<li>I get a full display of categories rather than a little Window showing about 3.</li>
<li>I can disable the WYSIWIG editor in WordPress, which removes one past source of hacker attacks. Note that it is safer now, but on this subject it is useful to be slightly paranoid.</li>
<li>I can do Wordpress and Technorati Tags, and Customised Fields directly from my PC desktop.</li>
<li>I can go and write in a pub over a pint, or on a train without the risks of a mobile connection.</li>
<li>A boilerplate text storage area.</li>
<li>Configuration was a doddle. You need to know your blog configuration settings, and what a few terms mean - but that is about it.</li>
<li>There are decent support forums.</li>
<li>Blogdesk is free.</li>
<li>Blogdesk supports the blog systems WordPress, MovableType, Drupal, Serendipity  and ExpressionEngine and does not support Blogger, which means that it helps get people away from that system. Some may disagree on this last point.</li>
</ol>
<p><span id="more-245"></span><br />
<h2>A Wide Choice</h2>
<p>There are a large number of desktop editors available, both free and paid. A <a title="Desktop Blogging Tools" href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/08/01/15-desktop-blogging-tools-reviewed/" target="_blank">recent post</a> on Smashing Magazine gave summaries of 15, and there was a decent discussion in the comments.</p>
<p>These are the ones they list:</p>
<ul>
<li>Windows Live Writer (Windows)</li>
<li>MarsEdit (Mac)</li>
<li>BlogDesk (Windows)</li>
<li>Zoundry Raven (Windows)</li>
<li>Ecto (Mac)</li>
<li>w.bloggar (Windows)</li>
<li>Thingamablog (Window, Mac, Linux)</li>
<li>Qumana (Windows, Mac)</li>
<li>Scribefire (Firefox)</li>
<li>BlogJet (Windows)</li>
<li>Flock (Mac, Windows, Linux)</li>
<li>Post2Blog (Windows)</li>
<li>Bleezer (Mac, Windows, Linux)</li>
</ul>
<p>This is the conclusion reached by <a title="Smashing Magazine" href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/08/01/15-desktop-blogging-tools-reviewed/" target="_blank">Smashing</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>If you have little experience in blogging you might try either Flock, Windows Live Writer or Scribefire. Those three have fairly intuitive interfaces and don’t have all the advanced features that more robust programs have. Also, they are free so you can check out what application better manages to cover your needs.</em></p>
<p><em>Advanced bloggers looking for a bit more firepower should try Ecto, BlogJet or BlogDesk. BlogDesk works especially well for bloggers who frequently use photos in their posts (Image Wizard). Windows Live Writer and Ecto have extra functionality built in, as they both allow you to install plugins to add specific features.</em></p>
<p><em>Every desktop blog editor is a great benefit to any blogger’s toolkit, as it saves time and has features that traditional blog platforms don’t always have.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h2>How to Proceed</h2>
<p>My recommendation is to try experimenting, while accepting that some people genuinely do not get on with offline editors. If you like it, the benefits can be significant.</p>
<p><a title="Scribefire" href="http://www.scribefire.com/" target="_blank">Scribefire</a> is worth a look if you do not like separate applications, as it is a plugin for the Firefox Web Browser.</p>
<p>You may need to experiment - I tried about 6 different editors before I settled on the one I like. So be patient.</p>
<div class="taglist">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bleezer" rel="tag">Bleezer</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BlogDesk" rel="tag">BlogDesk</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blogdesk+review" rel="tag">blogdesk review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BlogJet" rel="tag">BlogJet</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ecto" rel="tag">Ecto</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Flock" rel="tag">Flock</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Johannes+Oppermann" rel="tag">Johannes Oppermann</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/MarsEdit" rel="tag">MarsEdit</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/offline+blog+editor" rel="tag">offline blog editor</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Post2Blog" rel="tag">Post2Blog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Qumana" rel="tag">Qumana</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Scribefire" rel="tag">Scribefire</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/software+review" rel="tag">software review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Thingamablog" rel="tag">Thingamablog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/w.bloggar" rel="tag">w.bloggar</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Windows+Live+Writer" rel="tag">Windows Live Writer</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Zoundry+Raven" rel="tag">Zoundry Raven</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bleezer" rel="tag">Bleezer</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BlogDesk" rel="tag">BlogDesk</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blogdesk+review" rel="tag">blogdesk review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/BlogJet" rel="tag">BlogJet</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ecto" rel="tag">Ecto</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Flock" rel="tag">Flock</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Johannes+Oppermann" rel="tag">Johannes Oppermann</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/MarsEdit" rel="tag">MarsEdit</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/offline+blog+editor" rel="tag">offline blog editor</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Post2Blog" rel="tag">Post2Blog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Qumana" rel="tag">Qumana</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Scribefire" rel="tag">Scribefire</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/software+review" rel="tag">software review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Thingamablog" rel="tag">Thingamablog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/w.bloggar" rel="tag">w.bloggar</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Windows+Live+Writer" rel="tag">Windows Live Writer</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Zoundry+Raven" rel="tag">Zoundry Raven</a>[/tags]</div>
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/why-i-use-an-offline-blog-editor-20-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Market Penetration&#8221; by UK Political Blogs: Slugger rules the Roost: Blog Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/market-penetration-by-uk-political-blogs-slugger-rules-the-roost-blog-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/market-penetration-by-uk-political-blogs-slugger-rules-the-roost-blog-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Examples]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Number Crunching]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog platform]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[statporn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/market-penetration-by-uk-political-blogs-slugger-rules-the-roost-blog-platform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img height="386" alt="q-man-thinking" hspace="5" src="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/q-man-thinking-8.gif" width="225" align="right" vspace="5" />I've posted a couple of times recently about the Slugger Awards, and the Slugger O Toole blog.</p>
<p>Here's a nugget to chew on which throws some light on why Slugger is further integrated into the local political process than any other blog in the country: <strong>Slugger's penetration of it's local market is up to five times higher than any other site</strong> (to my knowledge, anyway).</p>
<p>A note on numbers: I am making the comparison by comparing Unique Visitors (representing how many individual computers have visited the website) for the largest political site in a country (England, Wales etc.) with the population of the Local Market. It's not a perfect comparison, since the percentage of blog traffic from outside the locality (country) varies, but it is good enough for this broad conclusion.</p>
<p>Site / Absolute Uniques per Month / Population / "Market Penetration"</p>
<ul>
<li>Northern Ireland: <a title="Slugger O Toole" href="http://www.sluggerotoole.com/" target="_blank">Slugger O Toole</a> ( 23,000 ) vs 1.75 million = 1.3%.</li>
<li>Scotland: <a title="Mr Eugenides" href="http://mreugenides.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Mr Eugenides</a> (~16,000 ) vs 5.2 million = 0.3%.</li>
<li>(*) Wales: <a title="Ordovicius" href="http://this-is-sparta.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Ordovicius</a> (~6-10,000) vs 2.9 million = 0.3%.</li>
<li>England: <a title="Order Order" href="http://www.order-order.com/" target="_blank">Guido Fawkes</a> (110,000) vs 51 million = 0.2%.</li></ul>
<p>(*) In Wales there are several blogs at roughly the same level.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img height="396" alt="q-man-thinking" hspace="5" src="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/q-man-thinking-7.gif" width="235" align="right" vspace="5" />I&#8217;ve posted a couple of times recently about the <a title="Slugger Awards" href="http://sluggerawards.com/" target="_blank">Slugger Awards</a>, and the Slugger O Toole blog.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a nugget to chew on which throws some light on why Slugger is further integrated into the local political process than any other blog in the country: <strong>Slugger&#8217;s penetration of it&#8217;s local market is up to five times higher than any other site</strong> (to my knowledge, anyway).</p>
<p>A note on numbers: I am making the comparison by comparing Unique Visitors (representing how many individual computers have visited the website) for the largest political site in a country (England, Wales etc.) with the population of the Local Market. It&#8217;s not a perfect comparison, since the percentage of blog traffic from outside the locality (country) varies, but it is good enough for this broad conclusion.</p>
<p>Site / Absolute Uniques per Month / Population / &#8220;Market Penetration&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>Northern Ireland: <a title="Slugger O Toole" href="http://www.sluggerotoole.com/" target="_blank">Slugger O Toole</a> ( 23,000 ) vs 1.75 million = 1.3%.</li>
<li>Scotland: <a title="Mr Eugenides" href="http://mreugenides.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Mr Eugenides</a> (~15-16,000 ) vs 5.2 million = 0.3%.</li>
<li>(*) Wales: <a title="Ordovicius" href="http://this-is-sparta.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Ordovicius</a> (~6-10,000) vs 2.9 million = 0.3%.</li>
<li>England: <a title="Order Order" href="http://www.order-order.com/" target="_blank">Guido Fawkes</a> (110,000) vs 51 million = 0.2%.</li>
</ul>
<p>(*) In Wales there are several blogs at roughly the same level.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not claiming huge accuracy for these figures, but the difference is startling even if my numbers are some way off. The sources are all from hosted web counter services.</p>
<p>It looks as though Slugger may have crossed several thresholds the others have not yet reached for an independent political site, and that - combined with the fact that it is 6 years old, nonpartisan and is read (for example) by nearly all Northern Ireland Parliamentarians - may account for the site&#8217;s ability to <a title="Slugger - Changing not Cirrcling the Political Process" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/10/14/slugger-political-awards-report-changing-not-circling-the-political-process/" target="_blank">impact in some broader way on the political process itself</a>.</p>
<p>This is a broad brush thesis and I am open to comment / correction.</p>
<h2>Wrapping Up</h2>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see the comparative local figures for English regional political sites - such as <a title="The Stirrer" href="http://www.thestirrer.co.uk/" target="_blank">The Stirrer</a> (Birmingham).</p>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blog+platform" rel="tag">blog platform</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/statporn" rel="tag">statporn</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+stats" rel="tag">web stats</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blog+platform" rel="tag">blog platform</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/statporn" rel="tag">statporn</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+stats" rel="tag">web stats</a>[/tags]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/market-penetration-by-uk-political-blogs-slugger-rules-the-roost-blog-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikio Rankings Updated</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/wikio-rankings-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/wikio-rankings-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Number Crunching]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog rankings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[top political blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[top uk blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wikio rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/wikio-rankings-updated/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following on from my article about <a title="Wikio Rankings for UK Political Blogs" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/10/05/wikio-rankings-changes-for-top-political-blogs-exclusive/" target="_blank">changes to Wikio rankings</a>, the update has now happened.</p>
<p>The Wardman Wire is number 13 amongst UK Politics Blogs, and 26 amongst all UK Blogs - based on editorial links in from blogs monitored by Wikio over the previous 9 months.</p>
<p>There is more detail in the previous article, but my headlines all hold with minor changes, except that Nick Robinson is still in the Top 20.</p>
<ol>
<li><a title="Liberal Conspiracy" href="http://www.libralconspiracy.org/" target="_blank">Liberal Conspiracy</a> is now number 3 (which puts it at no 7 in the rankings for “All UK Blogs”).</li>
<li><a title="Lib Dem Voice" href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/" target="_blank">LibDem Voice</a> is now ahead of <a title="Labour Home" href="http://www.labourhome.org/" target="_blank">Labour Home</a>. <strong>Update: In Top 10 for all UK blogs.</strong></li>
<li>Nick Robinson’s BBC Politics Blog has dropped (just) out of the Top 20 behind some Independents. <strong>Update: Still in Top 20 Politics Blogs.</strong></li>
<li>Dizzy Thinks is at number 18 <strong>(now 16)</strong>, having appeared from nowhere in the politics rankings last time.</li>
<li>The Wardman Wire is now number 14 <strong>(now 13)</strong> (18 under the previous system). Chicken Yoghurt has also advanced.</li>
<li>If Normblog were in the “Politics” not the “Other” category it would be in the Top 5 <strong>(now Top 6)</strong> in this list</li></ol>
<p>That is assuming, of course, that you care about this stuff.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following on from my article about <a title="Wikio Rankings for UK Political Blogs" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/10/05/wikio-rankings-changes-for-top-political-blogs-exclusive/" target="_blank">changes to Wikio rankings</a>, the update has now happened.</p>
<p>The Wardman Wire is number 13 amongst UK Politics Blogs, and 26 amongst all UK Blogs - based on editorial links in from blogs monitored by Wikio over the previous 9 months.</p>
<p>There is more detail in the previous article, but my headlines all hold with minor changes, except that Nick Robinson is still in the Top 20.</p>
<ol>
<li style="list-style: none"></li>
<li><a title="Liberal Conspiracy" href="http://www.libralconspiracy.org/" target="_blank">Liberal Conspiracy</a> is now number 3 (which puts it at no 7 in the rankings for “All UK Blogs”).</li>
<li><a title="Lib Dem Voice" href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/" target="_blank">LibDem Voice</a> is now ahead of <a title="Labour Home" href="http://www.labourhome.org/" target="_blank">Labour Home</a>. <strong>Update: In Top 10 for all UK blogs.</strong></li>
<li>Nick Robinson’s BBC Politics Blog has dropped (just) out of the Top 20 behind some Independents. <strong>Update: Still in Top 20 Politics Blogs.</strong></li>
<li>Dizzy Thinks is at number 18 <strong>(now 16)</strong>, having appeared from nowhere in the politics rankings last time.</li>
<li>The Wardman Wire is now number 14 <strong>(now 13)</strong> (18 under the previous system). Chicken Yoghurt has also advanced.</li>
<li>If Normblog were in the “Politics” not the “Other” category it would be in the Top 5 <strong>(now Top 6)</strong> in this list</li>
</ol>
<p></p>
<p>That is assuming, of course, that you care about this stuff.</p>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blog+rankings" rel="tag">blog rankings</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/top+political+blogs" rel="tag">top political blogs</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/top+uk+blogs" rel="tag">top uk blogs</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/wikio+rankings" rel="tag">wikio rankings</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blog+rankings" rel="tag">blog rankings</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/top+political+blogs" rel="tag">top political blogs</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/top+uk+blogs" rel="tag">top uk blogs</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/wikio+rankings" rel="tag">wikio rankings</a>[/tags]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/wikio-rankings-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did Politics Home get right at the end of September?</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/what-did-politics-home-get-right-at-the-end-of-september/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/what-did-politics-home-get-right-at-the-end-of-september/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Number Crunching]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alexa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicshome.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[us election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/what-did-politics-home-get-right-at-the-end-of-september/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I normally don't trust Alexa further than I can throw Ken Clarke with a toy catapult, but ...</p>
<p align="center"><img height="240" alt="20081009-just-politics-home-alexa-record-screenshot" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20081009-just-politics-home-alexa-record-screenshot.png" width="376" vspace="5" /></p>
<p>That is a big enough change to be worth a look.</p>
<p>You can see the graph and other data <a title="Politics Home on Alexa" href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/politicshome.com" target="_blank">here</a>. I have some thoughts for tomorrow, but I'd be interested to hear other views first in the comments.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally don&#8217;t trust Alexa further than I can throw Ken Clarke with a toy catapult, but &#8230;</p>
<p align="center"><img height="240" alt="20081009-just-politics-home-alexa-record-screenshot" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20081009-just-politics-home-alexa-record-screenshot.png" width="376" vspace="5" /></p>
<p>That is a big enough change to be worth a look.</p>
<p>You can see the graph and other data <a title="Politics Home on Alexa" href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/politicshome.com" target="_blank">here</a>. I have some thoughts for tomorrow, but I&#8217;d be interested to hear other views first in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/what-did-politics-home-get-right-at-the-end-of-september/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankaholic.com Blog sold for $15m</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/bankaholiccom-blog-sold-for-15m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/bankaholiccom-blog-sold-for-15m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Examples]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Number Crunching]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bankaholic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog sold]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[johns wu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/bankaholiccom-blog-sold-for-15m/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A real Friday post. The website <a title="Bankaholic" href="http://www.bankaholic.com/" target="_blank">bankaholic.com</a> has been sold for $15m.</p>
<p>From <a title="Bankaholic Bought" href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-bankrate-acquires-bankaholic-for-up-to-15/" target="_blank">Paidcontent.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Financial info site BankRate is expanding its financial product listings, as it’s acquiring Bankaholic, which provides info on deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts. The company will pay $12.4 million up front, with another $2.5 million possible earnout over the next 12 months. Bankaholic’s sole employee John Wu will assist in the transition and remain for an unspecified period of time.</p></blockquote>
<h3>Interesting points</h3>
<ul>
<li>The blog is built on Wordpress.</li>
<li>It is run by a single person - Johns Wu, and has been purchased by <a title="Bank Rate" href="http://www.bankrate.com/" target="_blank">bankrate.com</a>.</li>
<li>The traffic is not *that* high, which tells us something about the value of financial niche markets.</li>
<li>The blog is relatively new (the domain was <a title="Bankaholic" href="http://whois.domaintools.com/bankaholic.com" target="_blank">first registered in 2006</a>).</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real Friday post. The website <a title="Bankaholic" href="http://www.bankaholic.com/" target="_blank">bankaholic.com</a> has been sold for $15m.</p>
<p>From <a title="Bankaholic Bought" href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-bankrate-acquires-bankaholic-for-up-to-15/" target="_blank">Paidcontent.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Financial info site BankRate is expanding its financial product listings, as it’s acquiring Bankaholic, which provides info on deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts. The company will pay $12.4 million up front, with another $2.5 million possible earnout over the next 12 months. Bankaholic’s sole employee John Wu will assist in the transition and remain for an unspecified period of time.</p>
</blockquote>
<h3>Interesting points</h3>
<ul>
<li>The blog is built on Wordpress.</li>
<li>It is run by a single person - Johns Wu, and has been purchased by <a title="Bank Rate" href="http://www.bankrate.com/" target="_blank">bankrate.com</a>.</li>
<li>The traffic is not *that* high, which tells us something about the value of financial niche markets.</li>
<li>The blog is relatively new (the domain was <a title="Bankaholic" href="http://whois.domaintools.com/bankaholic.com" target="_blank">first registered in 2006</a>).</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bankaholic Traffic</h3>
<p>This is the graph of estimated traffic over the last two years from <a title="Bankaholic Traffic" href="http://www.quantcast.com/bankaholic.com/traffic" target="_blank">Quantcast</a>.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20081003-bankaholic-com-quantcast-traffic-graph.png"><img height="185" alt="20081003-bankaholic-com-quantcast-traffic-graph" hspace="5" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20081003-bankaholic-com-quantcast-traffic-graph-small.png" width="400" vspace="5" /></a></p>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/bankaholic" rel="tag">bankaholic</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blog+sold" rel="tag">blog sold</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/johns+wu" rel="tag">johns wu</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/bankaholic" rel="tag">bankaholic</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/blog+sold" rel="tag">blog sold</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/johns+wu" rel="tag">johns wu</a>[/tags]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/bankaholiccom-blog-sold-for-15m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Derek Draper got a Blog?</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/has-derek-draper-got-a-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/has-derek-draper-got-a-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[derek draper]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dolly draper]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[labour party]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pr week]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rebuttal unit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/has-derek-draper-got-a-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img height="250" alt="q-icon-no" hspace="5" src="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/q-icon-no.gif" width="400" vspace="5" /></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Derek Draper is the <a title="Labour Tories to dominate blogosphere" href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/home/article/848968/Labour-Tories-plot-dominate-blogosphere/" target="_blank">leader of Labour's new rebuttal unit</a>. I went looking for his blog and couldn't find it. Anyone who doesn't have a blog can't engage in conversation is likely to end up with a case of <strong>"Japanese students on bikes for the first time in their lives going round a traffic island the wrong way looking like Martians"</strong> syndrome.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the focus of the work needs to switch from one-way rebuttal to two-way debate and dialogue, and then DD will get an enthusiastic welcome from (nearly) everywhere.</p>
<p>Treating the blogosphere as something to be rebutted will be very, very embarrassing - especially if they end up needing to rebut things that are true.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/q-icon-no.gif" alt="q-icon-no" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="400" height="250" /></p>
<p>Derek Draper is the <a title="Labour Tories to dominate blogosphere" href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/home/article/848968/Labour-Tories-plot-dominate-blogosphere/" target="_blank">leader of Labour&#8217;s new rebuttal unit</a> . I went looking for his blog and couldn&#8217;t find it. Anyone who doesn&#8217;t have a blog can&#8217;t engage in conversation, and is likely to end up with a case of <strong>&#8220;Japanese students on bikes for the first time in their lives going round a traffic island the wrong way looking like Martians&#8221;</strong> syndrome.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the focus of the work needs to switch from one-way rebuttal to two-way debate and dialogue, and then DD will get an enthusiastic welcome from (nearly) everywhere.</p>
<p>Treating the blogosphere as something to be rebutted will be very, very embarrassing - especially if they end up needing to rebut things that are true.</p>
<p>(I develop this theme more at the <a title="Derek Draper Blog" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/10/01/has-derek-draper-got-a-blog/" target="_blank">Wardman Wire</a>).</p>
<p>Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/derek+draper">derek draper</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/dolly+draper">dolly draper</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Labour">Labour</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Labour+Party">Labour Party</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/pr+week">pr week</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/rebuttal+unit">rebuttal unit</a></p>
<p class="taglist">
<div class="taglist">[tags]<a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/derek+draper">derek draper</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/dolly+draper">dolly draper</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Labour">Labour</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Labour+Party">Labour Party</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/pr+week">pr week</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/rebuttal+unit">rebuttal unit</a>[/tags]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/10/has-derek-draper-got-a-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wardman Wire Reader Survey Week</title>
		<link>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/09/wardman-wire-reader-survey-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/09/wardman-wire-reader-survey-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[matt wardman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reader survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/09/wardman-wire-reader-survey-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'll keep this short, sweet and straightforward.</p>
<p>Over the last 12 months the <a title="Wardman Wire" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/" target="_blank">Wardman Wire</a> blog audience has grown reasonably quickly by about 6-7 times, and I'm thinking where to take it over the next year. The actual numbers are open to dispute depending on how you count them; but the comparison is consistent.</p>
<p align="center"><a title="WW Reader Survey" href="http://tinyurl.com/wwsurvey2008" target="_blank"><img height="150" alt="reader-survey" hspace="35" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/reader-survey.gif" width="300" vspace="5" /></a></p>
<p>We've experimented with lots of things including daily papers' reviews and writing content for different niches (politics, technology related to politics, MSM bashing - which is fun but depressingly easy, news, web statistics, cartoons, campaigns, local government and various others).</p>
<p>I need some decent information about who is reading the site to inform my thinking (and - hopefully - help convince advertisers) rather than my own wibblings, so please could you help by <a title="Wardman Wire Reader Survey" href="http://tinyurl.com/wwsurvey2008" target="_blank">filling in the reader survey</a>.</p>
<p>If I get more than 100 responses, I'll run a prize draw for anyone who wants to enter. Prizes will (inevitably) include a £25 Amazon token first prize and a promotional button spot for 6 months on the Wardman Wire home page shared among about 6-8 runners up.</p>
<p>I will also be publishing an analysis.</p>
<p>Fill in the survey <a title="Wardman Wire Reader Survey" href="http://tinyurl.com/wwsurvey2008" target="_blank">here</a>. Thanks for your help.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll keep this short, sweet and straightforward.</p>
<p>Over the last 12 months the <a title="Wardman Wire" href="http://www.mattwardman.com/" target="_blank">Wardman Wire</a> blog audience has grown reasonably quickly by about 6-7 times, and I&#8217;m thinking where to take it over the next year. The actual numbers are open to dispute depending on how you count them; but the comparison is consistent.</p>
<p align="center"><a title="WW Reader Survey" href="http://tinyurl.com/wwsurvey2008" target="_blank"><img height="150" alt="reader-survey" hspace="35" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/reader-survey.gif" width="300" vspace="5" /></a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve experimented with lots of things including daily papers&#8217; reviews and writing content for different niches (politics, technology related to politics, MSM bashing - which is fun but depressingly easy, news, web statistics, cartoons, campaigns, local government and various others).</p>
<p>I need some decent information about who is reading the site to inform my thinking (and - hopefully - help convince advertisers) rather than my own wibblings, so please could you help by filling in the reader survey.</p>
<p><img height="179" alt="q-donkey-carrot-stick" hspace="35" src="http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/q-donkey-carrot-stick.jpg" width="210" align="right" vspace="5" />I would have had a prize draw a la <a title="Iain Dale" href="http://www.iaindale.blgospot.com/" target="_blank">Iain Dale</a>, but since I&#8217;ve asked for basic demographic information (age bands 0 0-18, 19-34 etc.) and income information information (0-&gt;15k, 15k-&gt;30k) etc. I thought that it was unreasonable to obtain email addresses that could potentially be correlated against individual details (even though I wouldn&#8217;t do it).</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ll be doing a sort of &#8220;collective reward&#8221; instead.</p>
<p>If I get more than 100 responses, I&#8217;ll run a prize draw for anyone who wants to enter. Prizes will (inevitably) include a £25 Amazon token first prize and a promotional button spot for 6 months on the Wardman Wire home page shared among about 6-8 runners up.</p>
<p>I will also be publishing an analysis.</p>
<p>Fill in the survey <a title="Wardman Wire Reader Survey" href="http://tinyurl.com/wwsurvey2008" target="_blank">here</a>. Thanks for your help.</p>
<div class="taglist">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/feedback" rel="tag">feedback</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Matt+Wardman" rel="tag">Matt Wardman</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reader+survey" rel="tag">reader survey</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[tags]<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/feedback" rel="tag">feedback</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Matt+Wardman" rel="tag">Matt Wardman</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reader+survey" rel="tag">reader survey</a>[/tags]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poliblogs.co.uk/blog/2008/09/wardman-wire-reader-survey-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.038 seconds -->
